![]() |
Social Media Marketing is NOT a Direct Response Channel |
Frequently I speak with Chief Marketing Officers (CMO’s), Business Development Specialists, Product and Brand Managers regarding Social Media engagements and they always ask: “How many customers am I going to get directly from my Social Campaigns? What’s going to be my CPA, my ROI and my ROAS? What Immediate sales
will I get?” To this I respectfully respond: “Stop! Don’t look at Social as a direct response marketing channel.” These marketers often react in shock with a quizzical twist because they are used to hearing what they want which is: “Hey, all of our programs are going to get you crazy, mad sales dude, right away - mate.”
Why do I disillusion these Marketing officers at the risk of them not being interested in engaging social communities? I tell them this because Social Media is simply not a channel to look at every small user action as it relates to specific return on every dollar spent. It’s not Direct Response (DR). In many ways, it may not even be an outright “media buy”. With Social it may be important to discard concepts of CPA and traffic and other media buying models. Why?
Events in Social spheres are sometimes tough to track and tie-back, but more importantly, Social is not about individual sales nor is it about the individual. It’s about creating groups and momentous group action – to move the tide and let the waves grace your shores. The return will always be there if you approach your campaigns in a well planned manner and with the right intentions. The sales will come from connection, association, buzz, referral, love and fuzzy feelings of your brand, and lifetime value of clients. It’s a bit about buzz, a bit about brand loyalty, some SEO, and a whole lot about reputation management.
It is true that Marketers (including, Your’s Truly) are able measure specific actions taken by users in the Social Media sphere. There are plenty of products, methods analytics software and tools to handle events and actions on-line, but currently no one single tool is really able to tell you down to a CPA basis what a Social Media campaign is going to deliver. Tying it all together can be more expensive (and expansive) than the campaign itself.
So mostly, I tell my CMO buddies, it’s time to start thinking about Social from the point of view of connecting with the community and reaching out to start new conversations or join existing conversations taking place on the Internet. This is scalable, it has return on investment and you shouldn’t fear it. Just don’t look at it as buying traffic or buying sales; It’s NOT.
If you are after the CPA model, stick with your PPC, CPM and affiliate work. Social is not about “buying traffic” or “H.I.T.S.”(How Idiots Track Statistics) to your website. Social is not about making people click your BUY NOW buttons on the first go-round.
Social is about the knock-on positive, long-lasting, organic/SEO, bookmarking, tagging, forwarding, viral sharing, brand, search and actual social benefits. It’s about the consistent long term placement of your brand(s). Social is maintaining your brand and your reputation. In its best form it multiplies over time with compound growth. It’s all about acting like a human and networking in it’s traditional form; being a part of the discourse, part of the conversation, meeting people and not sucking people into an E-commerce funnel. In Social, it’s the shared experience among groups and audiences that provides value to your bottom line.
Others who’ve discussed the subject elsewhere are Hollis Thomases at ClickZ and Marc Meyer at Emerson Direct.
Don’t forget to subscribe to the 10e20 RSS Feed for more great search optimization coverage and updates!
Posted by Jake Matthews at 6:34 pm
Bookmark this post:
12 Responses to “ Social Media Marketing is NOT a Direct Response Channel ”
Trackbacks & Pingbacks:
Comments:
-
Zach Katkin says:
April 4th, 2008 at 6:44 pmI think what you’ve just pointed out is particularly powerful. The social web is about group momentum, not specific action or responses. I think I may have touched on something similar (but in a negative light) in a recent post regarding the recent Creative debacle.
-
Zach Katkin says:
April 4th, 2008 at 9:17 pmThanks for stopping by!
-
Jim Tobin at Ignite Social Media says:
April 5th, 2008 at 8:27 pmJake,
I do this full-time for a living, too. Our whole company does. But I only partly agree with you. I agree that social is different, and that in many ways it’s about branding. Plus, what’s the ROI of a trade show, or a press release? Few really know.
At the same time, my clients are carving out some percentage of their limited marketing dollars (even those who have millions have limited dollars).
If we as an industry are going to have it mature, we can’t live on the “don’t track this, it’s different” answer for very long. What we do is online, which offers us better opportunities than most to do some tracking.
I certainly don’t have all the answers yet, but it’s one of the key things we’re working on with our clients.
Keep up the good commentary.
~Jim
-
Jake Matthews says:
April 6th, 2008 at 10:54 am@ Zach - Thanks for stopping by 10e20 blog.
@ Jim - Thanks for your comments and I totally agree with you on your points - the focus with any effort is always on ROI ;-). When campaigns are properly executed ROI is there for sure, BIG TIME…and I think you would agree that the branding value in this channel is sometimes well above the return of other channels; that’s why I love it so much. This is more for some marketers who are used to traditional “signals” and really what we need to be looking for are some “new” signals or sets of signals. It’s also about the “approach” and mindset that marketers take when entering social which is really important. In Social, there are so many positive signals to look (editorial mentions, positive conversations started, knock-on SEO positives…sales etc.) at in most cases that it can often be difficult for marketers to capture the total picture.
-
Levi Wardell says:
April 7th, 2008 at 9:52 amJake-
I agree that this is a difficult arena to apply traditional tracking methods too, and I also agree that as social evolves it will become an easier realm to keep tabs on…however…
I want to caution those from corporate America to be mindful of what to expect when tracking a social campaign. More so than most vehicles, in social media you will only get (usually only a portion) of what you put into it.
You sum it up nicely here:
The return will always be there if you approach your campaigns in a well planned manner and with the right intentions. The sales will come from connection, association, buzz, referral, love and fuzzy feelings of your brand, and lifetime value of clients. It’s a bit about buzz, a bit about brand loyalty, some SEO, and a whole lot about reputation management.
What I’d recommend is to start backwards and track those actions taken to contribute to the conversation. How many users respond to your comments on Digg? When you invite friends on Facebook to use an application you’re using, how many accept? Start with simple metrics and measure your reach. Then when you feel trust is built, cautiously (and I emphasize cautiously)throw in items that will begig to provide an ROI.
-
Leslie Forgenie says:
April 8th, 2008 at 10:11 amEnjoyed the read. For some clients, this model is easier to comprehend because they understand the value of “connection, association, buzz, referral, love and fuzzy feelings of your brand” right away. For other clients, a harder case has to be made for their ROI before they make the investment. I agree with Levi that simple metrics such as measuring your reach is a good place to start.
-
Jake Matthews says:
April 9th, 2008 at 9:29 am@ Levi - thanks for stopping in. I do agree on most every point you make.
@ Leslie - thanks for stopping in as well. I agree with your points as well to a large degree.
Reach is extremely important and we see a long reach in most every case.
-
Sara Woulfe says:
April 23rd, 2008 at 12:51 pmInteresting read. Although not always the case, with online metrics it can be quite clear which online means are generating the buzz and delivering potential and future customers (depending on the lead time) to the website. However I completely agree that it is difficult to predict the “success” of a campaign but that is the nature of public relations whether online or offline.





April 7th, 2008 at 5:47 am
[…] doing all that always remember that social media is not a direct response channel, it’s about long term reputation […]
April 7th, 2008 at 8:58 am
[…]I read a post from Jake over at 10e20 blog recently with a promising title, ;Social Media Marketing is NOT a Direct […]
April 10th, 2008 at 7:08 am
[…] Social Media Marketing is NOT a Direct Response Channel […]
April 13th, 2008 at 6:07 pm
[…] Social Media Marketing is NOT a Direct Response Channel - […]